Introducing “Should you use AI for that?”

1–2 minutes

read

Sidra Collaborative is pleased to share our new resource: Should You Use AI For That? A GenAI Decision Tree for Cultural Organizations.

We know we’re not the only ones who have been thinking a lot about the role of generative AI in our work lately.

Many of our friends who work in funding are energized by the possibility of using generative machine learning tools (genAI) to streamline processes by sorting and summarizing applications, reviewing eligibility, and drafting and revising calls for proposals or outreach materials. At the same time, many of the grantmakers that we know are anxious about how applicants might be using the same tools to speed up their own efforts, from identifying funding sources to drafting applications.

The same is true among cultural organizations. GenAI can automate difficult and tedious processes, from transcribing historical documents to producing metadata and writing lesson plans. But these uses of machine learning technology are not without drawbacks, especially for organizations with strongly defined values and an obligation to steward information accurately and responsibly.

And everyone is worried about AI scams and AI slop.

At Sidra Collaborative, we understand the transformative role that machine learning can have in preserving and sharing cultural knowledge. As a graduate student, Hannah worked on a team developing machine learning applications for colonial-era records. As former federal grantmakers, all four Sidra Collaborative co-founders have supported projects that applied digital technologies to cultural heritage.

But after carefully assessing the AI landscape, we have determined that the costs of using genAI in our work far outweighs the benefits. That’s why our AI policy is clear: “we will not use generative AI to manage projects, conduct research, organize or analyze data, produce or revise writing, or generate outputs.”

Still, we know that we are facing a barrage of opportunities to change our minds and use just a little bit of AI (as a treat). To help us and our colleagues, clients, friends, and community members, we have designed the following AI decision tree. We hope it helps you find your way!

Should You Use AI For That? A guide for grantmakers and cultural workers from Sidra Collaborative.

Part 1: can you do the work without AI? No.

Why not?
1a. We're understaffed or we don't know how. 

If this is the case, is your boss making you do it? If yes, you can use AI, but your boss is wrong. If no, invest in people before machines!

1b. It would take too long. 

Oops! Studies suggest AI doesn't improve efficiency long term.

Part 2: Can you do the work without AI? Yes.

Are you trying to work more quickly? If so, sorry, studies suggest AI doesn't improve efficiency long term.

If no, are you trying to be more creative? 

If yes, have you tried going for walk, talking to other people, taking a class, or reading a book instead of AI? Try that instead.

If not, do you have sensitive data? If you do, don't use AI. 

If you don't, are you concerned about intellectual property? If yes, don't use AI. 

If no, do you care about truth and accuracy? If yes, don't use AI.

If no, do you care about environmental impact? If yes, don't use AI.

If no, you can use AI, but we wish you wouldn't.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Sidra Collaborative

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading